Alfonso Prosperi, Michele Longo, Paul A. Korswagen, Mandy Korff and Jan G. Rots
i Postdoc Researcher, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, A.Prosperi@tudelft.nl
ii Researcher, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, M.Longo@tudelft.nl
iii Assistant Professor, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, P.A.KorswagenEguren@tudelft.nl
iv Associate Professor, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, M.Korff@tudelft.nl
v Full Professor, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, J.G.Rots@tudelft.nl
ABSTRACT
Cycles of settlement and uplift beneath existing masonry structures can lead to visible cracks, which not only affect the aesthetic appearance and functionality of the building but can also compromise its structural integrity and undermine the occupants’ sense of safety. These cyclic ground movements can be triggered by seasonal actions, such as fluctuation in the groundwater table. In the Netherlands, many existing masonry structures on shallow foundations rest directly on the subsurface, making them vulnerable to cyclic ground movements. Settlement and uplift cycles cause “breathing” masonry cracks, which open and close over time without fully sealing. This study uses finite element analyses to investigate and assess the damage of structures subjected to cyclic quasi-static ground movements. A case study is presented for the analysis, featuring the geometry of an existing low-rise masonry structure with an age exceeding 50 years. A 3D non-linear shell-element model is used to evaluate the structural response, featuring an unreinforced strip foundation and including the non-linear tensile softening and cracking behaviour of masonry. Heaving and sinking displacements are applied to a non-linear interface simulating the soil-foundation interaction at the bottom of the strip foundation. The intensity of the ground displacements is quantified by their angular distortion. A damage parameter objectively assesses the severity of damage by considering the number, length, and width of cracks. Results indicate that repeated cycles of settlement (and uplift) have been observed to cause irreversible cracking damage in the model, with crack widths ranging from 1 to 5 mm, progressively increasing over time. Damage occurring during settlement is, on average, twice as severe as that during uplift. Overall, cycles of settlement and uplift may induce cracking damage up to twice as high as that caused by cycles of settlement alone, depending on the magnitude and shape of the ground movements.
KEYWORDS: Settlement, uplift, cyclic ground movements, unreinforced masonry, cracking damage, damage assessment, finite elements.
109-Prosperi.pdf
